Voltar para notícias
Teams16 de julho de 2026

Should England have been awarded a penalty on Harry Kane?

England faced the Democratic Republic of Congo in a game marred by controversy over a possible penalty on Harry Kane. The English captain ended up not being marked, but still secured the victory for his team with two goals at the end of the match.

Should England have been awarded a penalty on Harry Kane?

Should England have been awarded a penalty on Harry Kane?

According to Sports.

Context

Harry Kane, captain of the England national team, continues to be a central figure in the team, especially with his ability to score goals at critical moments. His performance against the Democratic Republic of Congo reaffirms his importance for England, who are looking to perform strongly at the 2026 World Cup.

Why this matters

The controversy over Harry Kane's unmarked penalty raised questions about refereeing at the 2026 World Cup. Referee Adham Makhadmeh's decision, which did not consider the foul, sparked debate among experts and former referees, reflecting the pressure that referees face in decisive games. England's victory, despite the controversy, is crucial to the team's confidence in the competition.

Main conclusions

  • Should England have been awarded a penalty on Harry Kane?.
  • England faced the Democratic Republic of Congo in a game marked by controversy over a possible penalty on Harry Kane.
  • Harry Kane remains central to England's plans.
In England's clash against the Democratic Republic of Congo, a controversial situation took over the game. When Harry Kane fell in the box, many fans and commentators began to question whether the referee should have awarded a penalty. The captain of the English team was in an attacking move, managed to get past goalkeeper Lionel Mpasi, but ended up being brought down before he could finish. The feeling that there had been contact was undeniable, and Kane was visibly frustrated with the decision of referee Adham Makhadmeh, who decided to ignore his team's appeals. The referee, who is from Jordan, suggested that Kane had simulated the foul, but did not issue a yellow card for the alleged simulation. The situation was reviewed by VAR, but the initial decision was maintained, leaving England at a disadvantage, as the team had already conceded a goal from Brian Cipenga at the beginning of the match, in the seventh minute. Kane, however, did not let himself be discouraged and returned to the field determined. In the final 15 minutes, he showed why he is one of the best strikers in the world, scoring two goals and securing England's 2-1 victory. The victory also guaranteed England's qualification for the round of 16, where they will face Mexico next Monday, July 6th. The discussion over the penalty continued after the game, with former referees and commentators divided over the decision. Darren Cann, a former Premier League referee, commented on BBC One that the situation was complicated, as opinion was divided among experts – some believed it was a penalty and others did not. "In the live play, it looks like a penalty, there was a small touch on Kane's ankle by the goalkeeper, and he could have expected that foul to be called. But from the referee's angle, Kane appears to have tripped and that could have influenced the decision," Cann said. Image BBC commentators were also indisagreement. Former England striker Wayne Rooney seemed incredulous that Kane had actually been brought down, saying the captain may have thrown himself at the goalkeeper. "I think he tripped and jumped on top of the goalkeeper, so maybe it's not a penalty," said Rooney. On the other hand, Joe Hart, former England goalkeeper, was surprised by his failure to score. "If I was in goal, I would expect a penalty to be awarded. Mpasi must be relieved not to have been given that decision," Hart highlighted. Micah Richards agreed, stating that Mpasi's touch on Kane would justify a penalty award. Steph Houghton, former captain of the Lionesses, also weighed in, saying that although Kane created contact, Mpasi was clearly at fault. "I'm shocked that VAR didn't reverse that decision, it was a clear penalty," he said. With emotions running high, the controversy over Harry Kane's penalty is likely to continue for a long time, especially if England face difficulties in the subsequent stages of the tournament.

What happens next

With the victory over the Democratic Republic of Congo, England advances to the round of 16, where they will face Mexico. Harry Kane, after his decisive performance, will be a key player for the English team in their search for the title at the 2026 World Cup. Expectations are high, and the team will need to maintain focus to overcome the challenges that lie ahead.

Perguntas frequentes

O que aconteceu com Harry Kane durante o jogo contra a República Democrática do Congo?
Harry Kane caiu na área e muitos questionaram se deveria ter sido marcado um pênalti, já que ele foi derrubado pelo goleiro Lionel Mpasi antes de finalizar.
Quem confirmou que a situação do pênalti foi revisada pelo VAR?
A situação foi revisada pelo VAR, mas a decisão inicial do árbitro Adham Makhadmeh foi mantida.
Por que a discussão sobre o pênalti continuou após o jogo?
A discussão continuou porque ex-árbitros e comentaristas estavam divididos sobre a decisão, com opiniões diferentes sobre se realmente houve falta.
Quais mudanças ocorreram no jogo após a queda de Kane?
Após a queda de Kane, ele se recuperou e marcou dois gols nos 15 minutos finais, garantindo a vitória da Inglaterra por 2 a 1.
Qual é a próxima partida da Inglaterra após o jogo contra a República Democrática do Congo?
A Inglaterra enfrentará o México nas oitavas de final da Copa do Mundo 2026 na próxima segunda-feira, 6 de julho.
What happened in this story?
Deveria a Inglaterra ter recebido um pênalti em Harry Kane? summarizes the main development covered in this report.
Who confirmed this news?
See the source attribution in the article for where this report was first published or corroborated.
penalti: Complete Guide & Latest Updates 2026 | torcidanet.live